Mood:
Topic: Women, Find Your Seats...
I was reading this book called Colonize This! Young Women of Colour on Today's Feminism, an anthology of short pieces by so-called feminists and their accounts on feminism and why and how it defines them, and it occured to me that most so-called feminists are filled with anger, emotional hostility, gender confusion, and misguided rebellion. And instead of feeling empowered or enlightened, i felt uncomfortable, tired even.
First of all, let me ask you, what is feminism to you? What does it represent and how does it affect your life? Why is it a big deal in your life? How is it important in shaping your views about life?
I admit some of the articles were amusing, perhaps because they were cleverly written. But what i could not fathom was why were these women filled to the brim with pent up anger, confusion and an unforgiving manner towards everyone around them? Feminist pundits are supposed to be well-read which makes them chic and cool to me, but i don't see them as liberated via feminism if they are still tugging with them decades of pent up anger baggage. I thought feminism was a liberating knowledge...
Most of these women hate their fathers. Fine. Some feel betrayed by their mothers because their mothers allowed themselves to be submissive, subdued or downtrodden by their men, hence "old school". But these modern women are even more screwed up than their mothers. At least their mothers could blame the unfulfilled life they had on their men, but these so-called educated, liberated women detached themselves from their mothers' mould only to fall into stupid, silly mistakes like contracting HIV in promiscuous sex, married Mr Wrong to spite mother and father, voyaging into lesbianism, and etc. Why do these American Feminists have to consider lesbianism as part of seeking themselves? If homosexuality is such as big deal in Women or Feminist Studies, then how come there aren't any courses called Men's Studies or Masculine Studies?
Also, i feel that it's about time that women of colour stop feeling sorry for themselves and as victims of oppression. The world is not going to change. Marxist's rule is that there will always be the oppressor and the oppressed, so let's just get with the programme, shall we?
Many of these tales spoke of how in feminist conventions, Latin women feel sidelined by black women because they don't have the same shade? Black women argue that their "issues" aren't the same as other "coloured women". I mean, let's face it, what is not white is considered "colour". Isn't that how it started? The binary opposition of how what is not white is The Other and that that's where we all fit in? So why are feminists creating other marginalities within feminists itself? Apparently, the argument today is, each colour (save for white, now they seem to be the ones at peace with themselve) claim to be "different". Each claims to be a more victim than the other... Aren't we supposed to be on one side?
As for the Asian Americans, most of them are too busy trying to not be their traditional mothers by sleeping with as many men as they can (because their mothers only slept with ONE), explore with bi-sexuality (because their mothers only relegated to ONE sex), and put the blame on their mothers for everything that goes wrong in their life (like being single at 36 or being married to Mr Wrong and not fulfilled by 36 because through thick and thin, their mothers stuck by ONE man in her life).
Somehow i feel that some women today are using knowledge on feminism to feel worse about themselves.
So what if i attend one of these conventions and being coloured AND Asian, where the hell am i supposed to sit? I think I'll go and sit with the whities. At least, there, i know where i stand and the racism that might exist is still as clear as black and white... Duh...
Book is edited by Daisy Hernandez amd Bushra Rehman
Posted by arultasha22
at 7:39 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, 3 November 2005 8:10 PM EST